The Death Of Environmentalism

Posted on Sunday, May 22 at 09:24 by Milton
Some believe that this framing is a political, and not just conceptual, problem. "When we use the term 'environment' it makes it seem as if the problem is 'out there' and we need to 'fix it,'" said Susan Clark, Executive Director of the Columbia Foundation, who believes the Environmental Grantmakers Association should change its name. "The problem is not external to us; it's us. It's a human problem having to do with how we organize our society. This old way of thinking isn't anyone's fault, but it is all of our responsibility to change." You may read the rest of this paper at the Grist">http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2005/01/13/doe-reprint/">Grist magazine site.

Note: Grist">http://www.grist.org/ne...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Mon May 23, 2005 12:33 am
    It's "environmental" in the sense that whatever change occurs, does so in an indifferent and all-encompassing way, and we have little or no control over the phenomena (meaning, we can't use it to our advantage). At least we in the west can keep such things as poverty relegated (sort of) to specific areas of the globe (read: away from us), and so it can be labelled "manmade".

    ---
    RickW

  2. Tue May 24, 2005 10:39 am
    This is a bad title for the article but first I'd like to make a quick reply to state that 'relegating poverty' is not to other parts of the globe but other geographical locations. Natives (specifically) live in poverty, as does a significant proportion of our population.

    However, environmentalism is far from dead, in fact if you know your history since world war two environmentalism is just being born. It has now entered the mainstream, as one example the argument out east is that no new refineries can be built because nobody will allow one 'in their backyard'. While I don't believe that, it is a quick example of something that occurs daily now. Practices, specifically business ones, which would have gone ahead without much thought are now challenged in court. Wal Mart in Guelph is having to exert enormous pressure to get a store built, in the past it would be a foregone conclusion.

    Each year on my street I notice fewer and fewer pesticide signs on laws and lawn care companies have be forced to radically change how they do business, and this has all been without ANY government support of the issue.

    So this really is one of those areas where it is good news, and far from 'death'. There is no doubt that there are dozens of new challenges, and the media is hard at work to avoid discussing them, but the days are gone when the environment was just someplace to dump garbage.

  3. by RPW
    Tue May 24, 2005 3:41 pm
    Sorry! I should have said "out of sight, out of mind". But as far as environmentalism actually thriving, I think the "out of sight, out of mind" critique applies as well. A program on China I was listening to made reference to air so fouled that it was the equivalent of smoking two packages of cigarettes. As we import great quantities of Chinese-produced goods, we have simply shifted our problems to "over there".....which is not a shift at all, from the global perspective.

    ---
    RickW

  4. Tue May 24, 2005 8:08 pm
    Quite true.

  5. Tue May 24, 2005 11:21 pm
    Thank goodness my ancestors during the last ice age drove around in SUV's.... otherwise we might still have to contend with rabid Wooly Mammoths in Canada. *shudders*

  6. Wed May 25, 2005 2:51 am
    Considering most 'environmentalists' prefer to rid the world of humans in order to achieve their Nirvana - it would be good if that political movement were to die off.

    It's only an outlet for people who want to tell other people how they must live anyhow - that's why it got so popular after socialism could plainly be seen as an absolute failure.

  7. Wed May 25, 2005 3:00 am
    Yeah, the people who want to get rid of pesticides because a corporation is making billions while the kids are all getting leukemia are people 'telling other people what to do'. And who needs those people who point out that we're getting cancer from biosolids which are toxic and are sprayed on farmers fields. Oh, and those do-gooders who lobby because PCBM's and other chemicals are showing up in human breast milk at huge rates. Bloody do gooders.

  8. Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:53 am
    way to shut em up... nice. i totally agree with you, i am thankful everyday that there are people out there that give a shit about something other than the 'almighty dollar.' wish there were more.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news