Some believe that this framing is a political, and not just conceptual, problem. "When we use the term 'environment' it makes it seem as if the problem is 'out there' and we need to 'fix it,'" said Susan Clark, Executive Director of the Columbia Foundation, who believes the Environmental Grantmakers Association should change its name. "The problem is not external to us; it's us. It's a human problem having to do with how we organize our society. This old way of thinking isn't anyone's fault, but it is all of our responsibility to change."
You may read the rest of this paper at the Grist">http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2005/01/13/doe-reprint/">Grist magazine site.
Note: Grist">http://www.grist.org/ne...

---
RickW
However, environmentalism is far from dead, in fact if you know your history since world war two environmentalism is just being born. It has now entered the mainstream, as one example the argument out east is that no new refineries can be built because nobody will allow one 'in their backyard'. While I don't believe that, it is a quick example of something that occurs daily now. Practices, specifically business ones, which would have gone ahead without much thought are now challenged in court. Wal Mart in Guelph is having to exert enormous pressure to get a store built, in the past it would be a foregone conclusion.
Each year on my street I notice fewer and fewer pesticide signs on laws and lawn care companies have be forced to radically change how they do business, and this has all been without ANY government support of the issue.
So this really is one of those areas where it is good news, and far from 'death'. There is no doubt that there are dozens of new challenges, and the media is hard at work to avoid discussing them, but the days are gone when the environment was just someplace to dump garbage.
---
RickW
It's only an outlet for people who want to tell other people how they must live anyhow - that's why it got so popular after socialism could plainly be seen as an absolute failure.