Some of the limited allocated time will go, as it must, to paying tribute to our soldiers. But part of the opposition rhetoric will be devoted to deflecting the Harper strategy, copied from George W. Bush, of equating criticism of politicians with disloyalty to the troops.
It is now clear that Gen. Hillier and the Paul Martin Liberals have been less than honest about what they've got us into in Afghanistan.
Our 2,300 troops are part of a "multinational operation" in which we are the only nation, the Dutch and the British having delayed their deployments.
We are part of a NATO operation that doesn't quite exist. We are working for, and under, the U.S. command. That's no sin until you realize what Ottawa has committed our troops to.
The twin tasks assigned them — beating back the Taliban's guerrilla warfare, and eradicating opium — are misguided and, for the most part, destined to fail. Our soldiers will inherit the ill-will generated by Americans in the last four years of failed attempts at finding Osama bin Laden, using such obtuse tactics as terrorizing entire villages with scary nighttime raids, mass arrests and with little care for civilian deaths.
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1144446612409&call_pageid=970599109774&col=Columnist969907621513
Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

---
People who openly hate America, while making money from America, burning U.S. flags, waving Mexican and Jamaican flags, while demanding the right to be American
NUCLEAR air strikes against Iran. Those would be "first strikes"
automatically invoking the victim's right to use Nuclear retaliation.
What possible gain does the Canadian government (whether
Martin's or Harper's) see in aligning ourselves with these lunatics!
Anyhow, even he acknowledged that when the JcoS want the options laid out for the complete removal of a site 75 feet underground, a tactical thermo-nuclear is the best option as far as eliminating doubt – that hidden facility will be no more. That’s the job of an advisor in this case – to lay everything out on the table.
The problem is, of course, the administration’s reluctance to do the obvious – remove that option entirely for very self-evident reasons.
Again, I think it is pure posturing and nothing more. Even their own estimates have Iran not being truly capable for about 8 years. Plenty of time for diplomacy (fingers crossed).