Seniors Get Pay Boost ... 33 Cents A Day!

Posted on Tuesday, October 03 at 12:28 by BC Mary
As it happens, details of all that other spending just landed on our desk in the same pile of future recycling as the pensions press release -- three thick volumes of the annual public accounts showing what happened to all our tax money in the past year. Here's a sample (and we're not making this stuff up): - Harper's first photo op with George Bush set the treasury back almost $300,000 for their 36 hours in Mexico, not counting the government jumbo jet, but including the costs of the PM's large communications entourage that spent most of the time hiding from the media. - Taxpayers coughed up a total of $568 million last year for "weapons and ammunition." While most of that was spent by National Defence, we would note that $36,137 was used for artillery purchases by, ahem, the national gun registry. http://www.ottawasun.com/News/Columnists/Weston_Greg/2006/10/03/pf-1941770.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 4, 2006]

Note: http://www.ottawasun.co...

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:53 pm
    This is exactly what I would expect from the Harper government. $100 a month for child care (taxable of course) and an extra 33 cents a day for the folks at the other end of life. I expect there will be much more of the same in the years to come. On the other hand I expect to hear of some corporate tax cuts very soon. As the article shows there is a jumbo jet available for goverment use, what an example to the nation of energy conservation. Can't wait to hear the new environment ministers plans to cut pollution.

    Frank

  2. Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:20 pm
    Apparently blowing up Afghanistan and defending war criminals is much more important than taking care of the folks who worked hard and built up this country.

  3. Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:07 pm
    The OAP is supposeed to be tied to the inflation rate. The main culprit her is StatsCan who publish the most corrupted figures on inflation. Our grocery bills seem to be going up by several percent every month, but the real inflation is not recorded anywhere, by any agency responsible.

    In my calculations, the real cost of life went up at least 1000% in the past 35 years,and about tripled since the 1989 FTA, then NAFTA, but wages remained either stagnant, or perhaps doubled. This is not recognized anywhere.

    We live in the most corrupt society that could be imagined and the people responsible for this are the phoney economists and the chickencrap politicians of all parties.

    Ed Deak.

  4. Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:22 pm
    I agree, the true inflation rate is being suppressed. We're being lied to on just about everything.

    If you take a look how much fuel prices have gone up, that's a good indicator as to what the true inflation is like. Everything from food production to toilet paper production is dependent on oil, so when oil goes up, so does everything else.

    Another form of inflation is how much we're being taxed on. Since a lot of taxation is a percentage function of retail prices, when prices go up, so does taxation by the same percentage amount.

    I suppose the reason for lying about the inflation rate, is to get people to accept working more for less.

  5. by Deacon
    Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:26 pm
    Just out of curiosity, I looked up the original list price of the 1953 Covette so I could compare it to the 2006 model.

    1953 Covette @ $3498 vs 2006 @ 75,000+

    The 2006 price is approx 21.44 times the cost of the original or 2,044% more.

    I picked the Corvette because it was one of the few cars that had a production history long enough to make a comparison like that possible.

    In 1953, gasoline cost roughly 14.9 cents a gallon. Today at the local gas station where I buy my gas it is 95.7 a litre or $3.66 a gallon (I used the 3.8 litre US gallon in the calculation because the reference source I used did not specify gallon type). The math comes out as 3.66/14.9 = 24.22 times as much. an increase of 2,344%.

    I don't know what the minimum wage was back in 1953 because so far I haven't been able to find out what it is, but I have heard that it was about 50 cents an hour. If anyone can verify that, I'd appreciate it.

    However, using the current BC min wage of $8.00/hr and the value of the 1953 wage i was given, we come to an increase of 16 times, or 1400 percent.

    Obviously, wage has not kept up with the two increases noted so far.

    Thus far I have not been able to find the prices of bread, milk, eggs, and potatoes for 1953. But if/when I do i will post them and the inflation ratios for those as well.

    Feel free to contribute whatever data you have.

    Thanks.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  6. by Deacon
    Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:28 pm
    "16 times, or 1400 percent." should be "16 times, or 1500 percent."

    Typo.



    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  7. by Deacon
    Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:31 pm
    "an increase of 2,344" should be "an increase of 2,322"

    Message to self: never proofread when waking up.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  8. Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:35 am
    Nice job of screwing over the seniors, hey? Shows that this government has absolutely no respect whatsoever for its citizens, young or old. If this doesn't tell you what kind of garbage scum runs this country, nothing does.

    In 1950, a first class postage stamp cost 4 cents. In 1964, the minimum wage was set at $1.00 per hour. In 1972, a barrel of oil cost 6 bucks.

    Don't believe the B.S. you hear from the economists/spin doctors. Numbers don't lie - people lie.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news