FCM Report Says Infrastructure "Near Collapse"

Posted on Tuesday, November 20 at 10:20 by N Say
“Canada’s economy and quality of life and the health and safety of Canadians depend on the infrastructure our municipalities build and own, yet we don’t have the resources to maintain it. If we don’t act soon as a nation to tackle this deficit, we will see more catastrophic failures in our roads, bridges, water supply and other vital infrastructure. Continued delay is unthinkable.” The $123-billion estimate in the study includes “sub-deficits” for key categories of municipal infrastructure: water and waste water systems ($31 billion), transportation ($21.7 billion), transit ($22.8 billion, solid-waste management ($7.7 billion) and community, recreational, cultural and social infrastructure ($40.2 billion). Similar to earlier studies, this report provides a “snapshot” of what municipal governments identify as their infrastructure funding needs. It does not provide an exhaustive or complete account of the physical condition of municipal infrastructure. Dr. Mirza said: “The $123-billion figure, when compared with earlier estimates, clearly shows the municipal infrastructure deficit is growing faster than previously thought. Most municipal infrastructure was built between the 1950s and 1970s, and much of it is due for replacement. As assets reach the end of their service life, repair and replacement costs skyrocket. Across Canada, municipal infrastructure has reached the breaking point.” Steeves said FCM is calling on the federal government and all parties in the House of Commons to acknowledge the problem and the need for a real national plan to fix it once and for all. “One thing is certain,” said Steeves, “the cost of fixing this problem will only go up. Any serious plan to eliminate this deficit must begin with an acknowledgement of the scope of the problem and the urgent need to address it. I have written to all party leaders today. All Canadians look forward to their response.” http://www.fcm.ca/english/media/press/nov202007.html here's the report: http://www.fcm.ca/english/advocacy/mdeficit.pdf

Note: http://www.fcm.ca/engli... http://www.fcm.ca/engli...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by N Say
    Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:30 pm
    I haven't read the entire report yet but I did search (ctrl-f) it for stuff that might be related to the $33 billion Building Canada fund, and found nothing. There was simply no mention of it, either to say it's a good start, or to criticise it one way or another. The Conservatives might as well have not created it at all. I think it's inconceivable that they wouldn't be aware of it but still the FCM just didn't even acknowledge its existence in this report.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  2. Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:54 pm
    The cost to fix the problem (assuming there really is one) is peanuts compared to what our corrupt federal government is spending on fighting Bush's war in Afghanistan.

  3. by N Say
    Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:56 pm
    How much has the government spent on the mission in Afghanistan?

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  4. by N Say
    Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:07 pm
    there was no mention of Quebec's $30 billion committment to upgrading their infrastructure either.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  5. Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:11 am
    A former, high ranking professional type civil servant in Alberta told me that the infrastructure of that wonderful oil economy is $100. billion in the hole, while talking about surpluses and money in the bank.

    This is only for one province. Here in BC our roads etc. are falling apart from lack of maintenance, while bigger and bigger ore etc. trucks are taking our wealth abroad for the benefit of "wealth creating foreign investors". These trucks are permitted to run, each taking $500,000 worth of ore, even during breakup time,when logging trucks are banned.

    The Afghanistan adventure is a crime, and a total waste of lives and costs, but nothing in comparison to what the multinational corporate mafia steals from this country every day.

    While economist count this legalized theft as "growth of the GDP", even if we get no benefits, apart from some jobs and chickenfeed royalties.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  6. Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:40 am
    Looks like it's only a few billion.<br />
    <br />
    Source<br />
    <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/bythenumbers.html">http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/bythenumbers.html</a><br />
    <br />
    The military costs for the mission in Afghanistan reached $2.6 billion in March 2007, or nearly $1.3 million per day of the mission. The costs are projected to reach about $4.3 billion by the planned end of the mission in February 2009.<br />
    <br />
    Canada's spending for development in Afghanistan up to May 2006 was $466 million. By 2011, it is expected to reach $1 billion.<br />
    <br />
    The Canadian Forces has spent over $1 million on funeral services for soldiers killed in Afghanistan.<br />
    <br />
    Establishing a Tim Hortons location in Kandahar has cost about $1.1 million for the first 12 months, according to the Department of National Defence.

  7. by N Say
    Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:55 am
    so slightly less than the $123 BILLION that the FCM says is needed?

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  8. by N Say
    Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:38 pm
    Infrastructure not near collapse: feds<br />
    We allotted billions: transport minister<br />
    <br />
    MIKE DE SOUZA, CanWest News Service<br />
    Published: 6 hours ago<br />
    <br />
    The Harper government is questioning the validity of warnings in a new study that claims that a $123-billion building deficit is putting Canada's water-treatment facilities, roads and public infrastructure on the verge of collapse.<br />
    <br />
    ...<br />
    <br />
    In the Commons, Prime Minister Stephen Harper dismissed the concerns, explaining that his government had answered the country's infrastructure needs.<br />
    <br />
    "Since coming to office, this government has announced record amounts of spending, and record new programs into dealing with infrastructure in Canada," Harper said.<br />
    <br />
    Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon added that the government has worked with municipalities to develop its six-year, $33-billion Building Canada plan. The federation has also praised the government for renewing its transfer of a portion of the sales tax on gasoline to help cities meet their infrastructure needs, he said.<br />
    <br />
    But representatives of the federation said the Building Canada plan is part of a patchwork of ad hoc programs that don't necessarily deliver resources for cities and communities.<br />
    <br />
    ...<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=5a82d6b0-1161-419d-af1e-743bac1400be&k=8374">http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=5a82d6b0-1161-419d-af1e-743bac1400be&k=8374</a><p>---<br>"George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  9. Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:16 pm
    Yeah, looks like just a little less. OK, so I was way off the mark, but why are we spending our hard earned money (stolen through our taxes) to build roads and bridges in Afghanistan when we should be building them here? We're also talking about an investment that spans several decades since the 1950's. What kind of reward are we going to get from the money that's being sunk into Afghanistan? All I see are dead soldiers, dead civilians, and Canada's image as a peaceful nation tarnished. Before we can help others (which is not what those wars are about anyway) we have to first take care of ourselves.

  10. Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:27 pm
    "but why are we spending our hard earned money (stolen through our taxes) to build roads and bridges in Afghanistan . ."

    Because they are so utterly poor, if we give them a little infrastructure, their economy will be on the first step of the ladder toward becoming independent, and we can leave the place better than we found it. Something no one else has done for them in 100 years.


    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.

  11. Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:13 pm
    Sociopaths have no compassion, so why did they invade and occupy Afghanistan? There are many other countries in this world that are just as poor, some with people much worse off before this war even started. Then there's the knowledge that the 9/11 excuse was a lie. Clearly, if our infrastructure needs a major overhaul that should come first, second, and third in terms of priority. That's what all that stolen tax money was supposed to be for. In a so-called democracy we don't toss money at politicians so they can do whatever they please with it, instead we're supposed to give them a mandate, and last I checked very few people support spending money on wars of conquest. <br><br> <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061001/afghanistan_poll_061001/20061001/">Canadians see Afghanistan as lost cause: poll</a>

  12. Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:16 pm
    Meanwhile schools are being closed left right and center. The claim is that there are not enough students, yet instead what we see are school closures and classrooms packed to the breaking point in an effort to save a buck - presumably so the money can be spent on something else that's much more important than our future.

  13. Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:56 pm
    If you didn't want the answer, why ask the question?

    ---
    The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news