In one example mentioned in the report, a recent medical study found that
half of the children attending a high school in Merebank, South Africa
suffer from asthma and other respiratory disorders. The study attributed
its findings to high concentrations of sulfur dioxide and other pollutants
spewed out by nearby mills and refineries operated by BP and Anglo
American.
Dr. Nonyenim Solomon Enyidah, a local health commissioner, told the
newspaper that the immense amounts of pollution generated by these plants
weaken local residents' immune systems and leave them vulnerable to polio
and measles. Yet the Gates Foundation, which is ostensibly in the business
of combating these diseases, continues to invest hundreds of millions of
dollars in the companies that help to create them.
The Gates foundation is set up as essentially two independent
organizations-an asset trust and a charity. The foundation's
investments-such as those made in BP and Anglo American-are made with only
one concern, profitability. By mandate, its investment decisions are
completely isolated from its charitable activities.
The foundation spends about 5 percent of its endowment each year, an amount
that essentially represents the return on its investments. This profit-and
the vast accumulation of personal wealth that forms the backbone of its
endowment-is made possible by the continued exploitation of workers and
poor people worldwide. What the foundation gives with one hand, it takes
with the other.
In response to criticism stirred by the LA Times report, the Gates
Foundation replied bluntly: "We do not anticipate any change in our
approach."
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/jan2007/gate-j22.shtml
Note: http://www.wsws.org/art...
