B.C. In The Dark On Enronization Of Their Energy

Posted on Saturday, October 28 at 15:51 by BC Mary
He cites the B.C. Energy Plan from 2002, which effectively barred Hydro from producing more power. This smoothed the way for the Independent Power Producers Association of B.C., which represents private power developers who have a virtual monopoly on the creation of new electricity in B.C. Rankin pointed me toward the work of SFU adjunct professor John Calvert, who is concerned that private investors will flip ownership of the most lucrative sites, selling them to energy multinationals. In a paper online at www.hydrofacts.bc.ca, Calvert notes that the B.C. Energy Plan "transforms B.C. Hydro from a generator of publicly owned electricity to a purchaser of energy from private power developers." "The Energy Plan signaled a fundamental shift from the earlier-and highly successful-policy of relying on the Crown Corporation to build and deliver B.C.'s electrical energy at prices based on the cost of production and controlled through public ownership of B.C.'s generation assets. This earlier policy resulted in B.C. prices being among the lowest in North America and enabled customers to enjoy a period of eight years with no rate increases whatsoever during the 1990s." http://www.vancourier.com/issues06/103206/opinion/103206op2.html [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 30, 2006]

Note: www.hydrofacts.bc.ca http://www.vancourier.c...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:43 am
    I cannot help but wonder, should the "Enronization" of BC's waterways become an NAU/NAFTA fact, will that mean the companies which exert control over BC's rivers then be able to determine that the best profits might well be diversion of these waters, in the syle of NAWAPA ( <a href="http://www.schillerinstitute.org/economy/phys_econ/phys_econ_nawapa_1983.html">http://www.schillerinstitute.org/economy/phys_econ/phys_econ_nawapa_1983.html</a> )?<p>---<br>"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

  2. Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:43 am
    "The Energy Plan signaled a fundamental shift from the earlier-and highly successful-policy of relying on the Crown Corporation to build and deliver B.C.'s electrical energy at prices based on the cost of production and controlled through public ownership of B.C.'s generation assets,,

    California had gone private a few years back and as we can recall, the plan didn't and isn't working. BC Hydro bailed them out. The problem in California was when the costs increased but the rates were fixed. Now the BC resident can pay the inflated prices to cover a large profit margin with the benefit of only dealing with a monoply. Just the way Campbell likes it. Profit before people. He and Harper likes to have their governments to run secretly in the background for reason.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news