Lettre Du Canard Réincarné Au GG

Posted on Tuesday, August 16 at 09:53 by gaulois
Un manifeste du Canard Réincarné est disponible sous la Foire Aux Questions (FAQ). Ce manifeste prétend qu'une tutelle de nos médias et instances démocratiques est en grande partie responsable du taux de décrochage (ou assimilation) des Francophones Hors-Québec (FHQs), du manque de renouvellement et du désengagement communautaire. Il nous faut absolument démanteler cette tutelle au moyen de réformes avant de considérer des solutions de francophilie ou de nouvelle immigration franco. Le commentaire politique de contre-culture "Astérix au Pays des Termites" aussi disponible sur Le Canard l'illustre avec sarcasme.

Je réalise que vous êtes probablement sollicités par toutes sortes de groupe pour qui votre nomination a suscité de l'espoir. Je sollicite néanmoins par la présente une entrevue portant sur votre vision du rôle du secteur ONG pour le renouvellement de la Francophonie en milieu minoritaire. Votre participation à une telle entrevue devrait inspirer positivement les bureaucrates de Patrimoine Canadien, du CRTC et de la Société Radio-Canada qui ne bougeront pas autrement. Les politiciens non plus, puisqu'il n'y a pas de votes FHQs. Je tiens à vous signaler que Culture.ca et la SRC pourtant responsables de la promotion de la culture francophone en régions minoritaires ne reconnaissent aucunement le Canard Réincarné et même encore le secteur ONG entier puisqu'il met au défi ses bureaucrates. Par ailleurs, les FHQs n'ont absolument aucune présence Internet à ce jour que ça soit en matière de blogues, de forums Internet ou de nouveaux médias. Et la prochaine génération décroche complètement d'un environnement périmé.

Le Canard Réincarné est seul comme organisme nouveau média ONG à tenter de rejoindre les FHQs et sollicite votre appui. Il essaie à grands efforts de motiver les Francophones Hors-Québec dispersés et mal réseautés à reprendre confiance en eux, à se réintéresser au français en s'y exprimant par écrit, et à se réengager dans leur communauté. Votre support pour l'initiative du Canard Réincarné pourrait faire une grande différence pour l'avenir des FHQs. Il faut nous aider à nous relever après les traumatismes de Riel, de la fermeture légiférée de nos écoles au début du siècle dernier et de notre mise en tutelle plus récemment.

Bien sincèrement,

...

Note: manifeste

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:10 pm
    But he funded the FLQ....

  2. Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:58 pm
    Time to turn the page and move on. The FLQ was active in the 60s and early 70s. Perhaps you would you like to get back to it?

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:40 am
    Forgot to mention that ***a lot*** of intellectuals in Montreal got rounded up by Trudeau's War measures Act (October '73). Some people that actually did not care as much as you might think actually started to think otherwise. The FLQ "cells" were a very isolated bunch afterall. The PQ had its first and huge majority government couple years later in 1976...

    Reminds me so much now of what Bush did to the Muslim world that had a lot of pent-up anger. Les temps changent et se ressemblent. Read Lester's Black Book translated by Ray Conlogue if you want to understand the franco anger. I could go on myself with the federal government legislated closure of franco parents run school early in the 20th century throughout the ROC (or PET's 1968 buyout of every single FHQs to become a civil servant and live under the bubble). These ones left IMHO a lot more permanent scars than whatever the FLQ did. Hard to turn the page and move on. Isn't it?

    Jean is an excellent choice for a GG. Why don't we just give her a chance???

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  4. by gorian
    Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:42 pm
    "Why not just giver her a chance???"

    If she's a seperatist she doesn't belong there. She should be fired immediately, and Paul Martin deeply chastised. If she is a seperatist, this would be far worse than Adscam, and far more damaging for the liberals.

    Personally, I hope she hasn't been tainted and will make a public declaration to clear the air. Her hesitancy is perplexing, and feeding the fire.

    G

  5. Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:00 pm
    She is not currently GG and am not sure if by protocol can actually speak up yet.

    Have you ever thought that most Québécois are in fact both "federalist" and "separatist"? I know that many people struggle with this concept. Like can you be both "right" and "left" in the political spectrum?

    As far as I am concerned, both can work (feds/separatism & left&right) and it all matters of who actually makes these systems work. I would argue that a sovereign mind actually operates that way -vs- a person that has sold out to some great "cause". Look what happens to all these great causes, all hijacked by some special interest groups pretending pureness of the "are you with us or against us?".

    The federalists in Quebec have unfortunately been very corrupt for the last twenty years. Any clean persons that came in the ranks got corrupted as sonn as they moved in.

    Cela dit, Jean represent this important facet of Québécois mind. Should the RdC reject it, you will play within the realm of the "purs et durs" sovereignists. I personnally do not see much difference in between a pur et dur sovereignist and federalist.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  6. by gorian
    Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:09 pm
    Whether a large number of Canadians in Quebec are deluded by the words of separatists or not has nothing to do with the case at hand. The Governor General of Canada cannot be a separatist. Anybody tainted with that thinking is automatically barred from the position. <p></P> <a href="http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2005-08-17T162604Z_01_EIC759093_RTRIDST_0_CANADA-POLITICS-C-COL.XML">Luckily, she has realized this and come out singing the nation. </a> Welcome aboard, Jean! May your tenure be long and successful and elude the hands of corrupt misanthropes! <p></P> G

  7. by gorian
    Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:13 pm
    From <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050817.wjstatem0817/BNStory"> here in the Globe</a> <p></p> The following is a statement issued Wednesday by governor-general designate Michaëlle Jean: <p></p> I am deeply touched and wish to thank all those who have so warmly greeted the news of my recent nomination to the office of Governor-General of Canada. Others have questioned my attachment to Canada and that of my husband, Jean-Daniel Lafond. <p></p> I want to tell you unequivocally that both he and I are proud to be Canadians and that we have the greatest respect for the institutions of our country. We are fully committed to Canada. I would not have accepted this position otherwise. <p></p> We are equally proud of the attachment to Quebec that we have always shown beyond any partisan considerations. Let me be clear: We have never belonged to a political party or the separatist movement.

  8. Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:55 pm
    I read a lot of semantics in this. I am glad you can see that the glass is half full. Humorist Yvon Deschamps best summed it once by referring to a "Québec indépendant dans un Canada uni". Deschamps married an anglo woman and has lived this to its fullest extent...

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  9. by gorian
    Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:23 pm
    There is nothing equivocal about her position -- and luckily, certainly no semantic dallying or flirtation with separatism. If there was she wouldn't last a day.

    Canadians have always engaged with their nation through its regional manifestations. This, inevitably, confuses the more confusable.

    G

  10. Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
    The problem that you failed to recognize is that Québécois, First Nations and possibly many FHQs do not perceive themselves as belonging to the "Canadian" nation. They may be proud of it (I am!) but it does not mean that they "belong" to it. Go figure that out. Will you now ask to the GG is she feels that she "belongs" to the "Canadian" nation?

    You won't be able to shove that down people's throat no matter how hard you try. Trudeau tried and it did not work. It in fact backfired when he signed the War Measures's Act. Kind of what Bush tried to do with democracy in the middle East: the battle of the stubborn? Les "purs et durs" love people like you and will debate ad nauseam.

    Time to move on with our new GG and wish her well. I certainly did so earlier on.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  11. by gorian
    Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:39 pm
    I said "engaged with their nation" not "belong to their nation." It's a big difference: a nation is invented by the imagination and action of people. Canadians invent their nation on a constant basis by imagining their actions on the local level as a reflection of a national continuum.

    A friend of mine has a saying, which I love: "As Canadian as Canada." The recursive logic in his quote is the space of all nations -- an invention we enter into -- engage with -- or ignore. To ignore a nation is to kill it, for better or for worse. To be proud of a nation is to invest it with something, to fill it with imaginative possibilities (perhaps specific agendas, perhaps just the optimism of unknown potentials), and meaning. To be proud of the nation is to create the nation, and surround one aspect of one's imagination with the collective power it affords.

    There is no need to shove any such thing down Her Excellancy's throat -- she has declared her pride, she has declared her dedication to building the nation, alongside the millions of Canadians across the continent who have pledged the same. The Governor General is (now) a position specifically geared towards creating, building, and developing the Canadian nation -- which is why it is entirely inappropriate to have a separatist in the role.

    I don't believe that Trudeau is in any way comparable to Bush. The closest American president to Trudeau would have to Lincoln -- and look at how much preferable teh resolution of our civil eruption was to the hundreds of thousands of dead down there.

    G

  12. Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:27 am
    "To ignore a nation is to kill it, for better or for worse"
    Well look what happened to the First nations being ignored for how many hundreds of years until recently when we realized they owned land rights to vital resources???

    Look what happened to the FHQs with this Nation identity thing. They are more or less extinct out west, and more to come according to the Canada-stats. New immigration is not going to beat the trend and neither will "francophilie".

    You have made the Nation case extremely well!

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  13. by michou
    Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:02 am
    <p><i>Time to move on with our new GG and wish her well.</i><p>Ms. Jean has never been a separatist or a sympathizer, so she says. She has even pledged her allegiance to Canada today. Everyone is tickled pink and some Monarchy league president has even given her his blessing. She’s « clean ». <p> Like you gaulois, I sincerely hope Ms Jean will do a bang up job in Ottawa. So when Québec separates, you can all keep her. She won’t be wanted nor needed in a sovereign Québec republic. Paul Martin’s liberal government and Ms. Jean new status as head of state are a perfect fit. <p> Ooooohhhh ! Avez-vous vu tous les beaux ballons flotter au-dessus de Rideau Hall aujourd’hui ? « Quel beau pestacle ! » aurait dit Sol. <p>---<br>« Il y a une belle, une terrible rationalité dans la décision d'être libre. » - Gérard Bergeron <br />

  14. by gorian
    Mon Aug 22, 2005 2:53 pm
    Wonderful -- Canada welcomes the best and brightest French Canadians into the fold, and will hopefully seek to give them the best opportunities to lead the country in a positive direction. Separatists are more than welcome to the second-tier minds, and more than welcome to limit their own opportunities to decreasingly influential roles. Bravo -- we're both happy!

    G



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news