Vive Le Canada

Missile Defence Needs Parliamentary Debate
Date: Friday, December 19 2003
Topic:


Maude Barlow and Steven Staples think a Cabinet decision making a de facto Canadian commitment to NMD may be only a matter of days off.

In a new Straight Goods article, they argue that the issue needs a Parliamentary debate http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewFeature3.cfm?REF=429

Canadians expressed enough disapproval this summer that Paul Martin included a question about missile defence on his website. Even though the wording was loaded to discourage opposition, 35% rejected NMD completely.
http://www.paulmartintimes.ca/

Time to write the new Prime Minister and his new Minister of Defence, David Pratt (Bill Graham is still Minister of Foreign Affairs).


[Ed: To send an email fax visit http://www.ceasefire.ca]


Right Hon. Paul Martin, Prime Minister of Canada;
there is a sample letter at http://www.ceasefire.ca/

Hon. David Pratt, Minister of National Defence;

Hon. Bill Graham, Minister of Foreign Affairs;

Hon. Albina Guarnieri, Associate Min. of National Defence,

PS: Last week on the US side of the line, the Council for a Livable World released results from its security survey of Democratic presidential hopefuls. The issue on which they were most sharply divided was missile defence (only Dean and Lieberman supported it). http://www.missilethreat.com/news/20031211030100.html



http://www.straightgood... http://www.paulmartinti... http://www.ceasefire.ca Right Hon. Paul Martin http://www.ceasefire.ca/ Hon. David Pratt Hon. Bill Graham Hon. Albina Guarnieri http://www.missilethrea...



This article comes from Vive Le Canada
http://www.vivelecanada.ca

The URL for this story is:
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/132503239-missile-defence-needs-parliamentary-debate