Vive Le Canada

Senator Clinton's position on NAFTA - Interview CBC with Clinton's Advisor
Date: Sunday, March 30 2008
Topic:


Senator Clinton's position on NAFTA - Interview Katheen Purdy and

Gene Sperling, Senior advisor to Clinton.

Translated by Janet M Eaton

http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/thehouse_20080329_5133.mp3

The House, Saturday, March 29, 200



In the interview Hillary Clinton's economic advisor, Gene Sperling,  said the following :

" what she laid out in our campaign was that she felt that:


1.         Labour and Environmental standards were not strong enough


2.         that there needed to be stronger enforcement within the agreement


3.         that she was very concerned about what called Chapter  13 - or the

tribunals and whether they have a negative impact on our ability to

set our own environmental standards


4.  And forth - which is more of a US issue - is that she wanted a

process for review

 

And I think at least three of those four things require renegotiation of NAFTA 

and she’s been forth right about that and she has said what she meant

and meant what she said."



Senator Clinton's position on NAFTA - Interview Katheen Purdy and

Gene Sperling, Senior advisor to Clinton.



Translated by Janet M Eaton



http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/thehouse_20080329_5133.mp3



The House, Saturday, March 29, 2008



This week on the House, Kathleen Petty (KP) speaks with Hillary

Clinton's chief economic advisor Gene Sperling (GS) about the

Senator's position on NAFTA. She wasn't a fan when he helped her

husband negotiate the agreement and she hasn't warmed to it since.





KP I´m Kathleen petty and this is the House

 

 Gene Sperling was economic advisor to bill Clinton at the time the

former US President  signed NAFTA- now he´s advising Hillary Clinton

at a time when she´s wondering just how good a trade deal NAFTA

really is- Truth is she´s wondered that that for a long time for

months´ and unless it´s renegotiated she´ll walk away. Gene Sperling

took time away from the Clinton campaign trail to speak in Ottawa

about our mutual economic interests -Gene Sperling welcome to the

house.



GS - Well thank you for having me at the house and thank you for

Canada 20/20 for inviting me to  Ottawa



KP As Part of your remarks in that lecture series -I was  interested

to see that you acknowledged there e remains controversy about 

whether Bill Clinton should have signed NAFTA 13 years ago and that

`s and obviously that´s an  issue which is being debated during this

campaign  in the US and one we´re listening to very closely



You don´t have the answer to the question though  -should Bill

Clinton have signed NAFTA without side agreements on labour and the

environment



Those are very tough issues - he felt at the time that he wanted to

be the president that would be  first cold war President - he didn´t

think everything was perfect about the agreement but I think the

important  thing was he recognized that was not the standard for

agreements going forward- particularly on labour and environmental 

standards and reason this is very  important - it´s very important

for Americans to see that our engagement with the global economy is

never about a race to the bottom  - that it should be about trying to

raise the  wages and standard of living of working people in our 

country and in the countries we´re trading with- and I think there

was not enough confidence in that, in the way we were forced to do it

in NAFTA since it had been negotiated by the previous administration.



KP- I heard David Gherkin say on CNN that  to be fair to Hillary

Clinton- because the criticism has been that well her husband signed

NAFTA so why is she complaining about NAFTA now-  why would she be

doing that  and he said to be fair she was actually opposed to NAFTA

while he supported  it at the time



GS- Well in 1992 when I was economic policy director advisor in the

campaign there was a controversy and there were several people who

were opposed to it and she was one of them -and that was in the

campaign in 92 and then in 93 she was also very concerned that  even

if we were  going forward she did not want it to distract or dilute

her goals in terms of health care but I think first lady Clinton also

knew that for an administration to function when a decision´s  had

been made people have to pull together and support it publicly- and

that everyone has to do that when you are an administration  and

first lady as well but yes it is the case that she was not a fan of

NAFTA as it was originated- she tried to be a team player  as it went

forward and I will  say that I think a lot of her skepticism returned

when she became governor of New York- and she started dealing with a

lot of issues particularly in upper  state New York- and started

worrying very much as to whether or not this had been a good

situation for a  whole lot of American workers .



KP - I´m not trying to put you in a position of picking sides but the

impression in Canada is that the concern is Mexico as opposed to

Canada. Is it reasonable for Canadians  to conclude that



GS - well I don´t want to - ah ah  - I don´t know  if I can totally

say that - because I think there is no question that can say that

Senator  Clinton, as  a senator from New York, has had to deal with

some trade  issues dealing with Canada



KP-  Where  labour and the environment are concerned - because those

are the two side agreements she thinks ...?



GS - but I don´t´ want to couch things because I´m here- she has had

and did deal as senator from new York with some labour disputes -

mariculture disputers -I don´t think there´s any secret  that some of

those exist  but I think want she laid out in our campaign was that

she felt that



1.    Labour and Environmental standards were not strong enough

2.    that there needed to be stronger enforcement within the agreement

3.    that she was very concerned about what called Chapter  13 - or the

tribunals and whether they have a negative impact on our ability to

set our own environmental standards

4.    And forth - which is more of a US issue - is that she wanted a

process for review



And I think at least three of those four things require  renegotiation of NAFTA

and she´s been forth right about that and she has said what she meant

and meant what she said.



KP:  It sounds like it could be a pretty substantial renegotiation

though couldn´t it- just looking at the environment , taking labour

aside, just  looking at the environment  alone - just given the

policies of the current admin in the US,  the policies of Canada vis

a vis Kyoto- I mean  this could be quite complex- couldn´t I t



GS- Well I´ve been away long enough to know that the way you start

those negotiations are even not on the best of radio shows- you  know

when asked would she be willing to walk away from the agreement - she

said that would not be her preference. She wants to work something

out and its an option she did not take off the table because she is a

very tough negotiator and her and her team are going to be tough

negotiators.



KP- And I have to ask - I don´t want you to comment on the whole

NAFTA gate issue as it relates to Barrack Obama but it did occur to me I would remiss

if I didn´t ask if you´ve had different conversations in private with

Canadian officials than you´ve had publicly-



GS -  I´ve had not conversations at all with any embassy officials

about this or anything else.



KP couldn´t be plainer than that- let´s talk about the economy

generally-



GS Sure



KP To what extent does Senator Clinton believe that some of the

difficulties in the economy are related to not just NAFTA but to

trade agreements period



GS - I think what Senator  Clinton believes is that the mark of the

US economy is whether we have shared prosperity- and what was nice

about the 1990s was that we were enjoying the benefits of openness

and competition - but it was benefiting all working families- and the

typical middle income families saw there adjusted income going up by

$8,000 -what we´ve seen in the last seven years is kind of I growing

inequality between the most well Americans  and the middle class ,

We´ve seen wage stagnation- So I think she feels that we´re at a

point where there are a lot of questions about whether the 

combination of different global economic forces as well as the

failure of our own domestic economic policy has not served middle

income families. And what she really wants is a new bargain for

middle class families- She doesn´t think there a single issue causing

this problem not that there is a silver bullet- but what she does

believe  is that she has put forward a comprehensive package that is

designed to help the US still have, as John F Kennedy said a rising

tied but making sure that we get back to where it is  lifting all

boats and that the benefits of our growth and productivity is

benefiting the aspirations , wages and standard of living of the

American people.



KP - Gene Sperling that you for this



GS - thank you very much for having me



KS - Gene Sperling is the senior economic advisor to Hilary Clinton _





This article comes from Vive Le Canada
http://www.vivelecanada.ca

The URL for this story is:
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235929804-senator-clinton-s-position-on-nafta-interview-cbc-with-clinton-s-advisor