In this article David Sirota rebukes a potential decision to select Senator Evan Baye as a VP running mate: "Obama selecting this corporate Frankenstein would implicitly signal that the Illinois senator's populist campaign promises are a farce.
Sirota concludes with his own suggestion in a messge for Obama (Note to Obama: If you want to win Ohio, why not pick the Buckeye State's anti-war and anti-NAFTA Sen. Sherrod Brown?) and warns against picking a running mate who completely undermines his "change" message. If he does that, says Sirota "Democrats could be saying Bayh bye to the presidency"
Note also Davdi Sirota coverage of Sen. Brown from In These times April 2008
“A proposal by Senator Sherrod Brown (D Ohio) and Senator Byron Dorgan (D- ND) would make new trade agreements harder to pass ‘unless they are accompanied by a more thorough financial analysis’ The Washington Post reported their bill would end the practice of flying blindly into the free trade abyss by forcing governments to provide estimates of potential job losses with any trade pact. Congress currently makes trade policy without even asking about the consequences.”
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3577/the_upside_of_nationalism/
And note the major trade bill Senator Brown has introduced with Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine)
On Wednesday June 4, 2008 Democratic Party lawmakers Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine) introduced the TRADE Act wherein the United States would review and potentially renegotiate all existing U.S. trade deals.. The bill lays out new labor, environmental, food safety, investment, intellectual property, anti-dumping and other standards for trade agreements. It also sets a June 2010 deadline for the U.S. Government Accountability Office to review existing trade deals including NAFTA and more recent accords with Central American countries. Labor groups joined the Sierra Club, the National Farmers Union and Public Citizen in backing the legislation
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/06/04/lawmakers_citing_obama_urge_us_redo_trade_deals/?page=full.
Sounds like Senator Brown could be a significant choice if Obama's change message is more than rhetoric which is unlikely given corporate control and behind the scenes agendas of both parties.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/ 08/15/EDTJ12B8CE.DTL&type=politics
Will Obama wave bye to Bayh?
David Sirota, Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Friday, August 15, 2008
If you believe the chatter, Barack Obama is desperately seeking a white
guy - any white guy - to be his running mate. Democratic sources have
floated vice-presidential trial balloons for every pale-faced stiff in
the D.C. region - from Delaware Sen. Joe Biden to Virginia Gov. Tim
Kaine. But with Obama needing his "change" brand to overshadow his
recent flip-flops, no pick would be more self-defeating than Indiana
Sen. Evan Bayh - the career politician who best personifies "more of
the same."
The son of Sen. Birch Bayh, Evan has no discernible political skills
(unless "skills" include being the cure for insomnia and having a
famous last name). In the decade since this prince claimed his daddy's
Senate seat, he has amassed not a single significant accomplishment - a
miraculous achievement, even by Washington's do-nothing standards. If
he is known at all, it is for heading a business front group called the
Democratic Leadership Council, using that position to rake in corporate
campaign contributions and then paying back the money with votes.
For instance, in his 2004 campaign, Bayh raised almost $1 million from
the banking and financial industries, then voted in 2005 for a
bankruptcy bill helping those industries intensify their usurious
practices. Similarly, despite representing a manufacturing state
crushed by trade-related job losses, Bayh has voted for a bevy of
lobbyist-written trade pacts, including the monumentally destructive
China deal in 2000.
On foreign policy, it's even worse. Bayh has been a shameless Bush
parrot, infamously commending himself for being "tough and smart" after
aggressively supporting the war in Iraq- the same war that U.S.
intelligence agencies have said is severely weakening America's
national security.
Obama selecting this corporate Frankenstein would implicitly signal
that the Illinois senator's populist campaign promises are a farce. In
terms of demoralizing Democratic voters, a Bayh pick would make Al
Gore's 2000 choice of Joe Lieberman - the worst vice presidential
nomination in contemporary history - look positively brilliant.
But let's say Obama doesn't mind destroying Democratic enthusiasm for
his candidacy. Let's say he is specifically looking to win a Republican
state like Indiana. Even in that context, a Bayh nomination is
absurd.
Democrats have lost Indiana in every presidential election since 1964,
including the three that Bayh appeared on the statewide ballot. In the
June Democratic presidential primary, Bayh backed Hillary Rodham
Clinton - and yet, Obama nearly tied her in Indiana. That's correct -
the Bayh machine that is supposedly powerful enough to deliver Indiana
in the general election couldn't even muster a decisive intra-party
victory.
The most ridiculous arguments for Bayh are those insisting that his
nomination would a) appease embittered Clinton supporters because Bayh
was a Clinton supporter and b) help win Indiana border states such as
Ohio.
Like most D.C. analysis, this assertion assumes that most Americans are as obsessed with politics as professional pundits, and therefore that most Clinton voters a) know who Bayh is and b) know Bayh supported Clinton. Furthermore, the theory presumes that unemployed factory workers in places like Akron will decide to vote for Obama because of Bayh - even though most of them have never heard of the Indiana senator and those that have know him for voting to ship their jobs overseas.
(Note to Obama: If you want to win Ohio, why not pick the Buckeye
State's anti-war and anti-NAFTA Sen. Sherrod Brown?) If Obama has,
indeed, confined his vice-presidential search only to white men (a big
"if"), that's unfortunate, though unsurprising. With Obama facing a
continued barrage of race-tinged attacks, such calculation would be
predictable. But that doesn't mean he has to pick a running mate who
completely undermines his "change" message. If he does that, Democrats
could be saying Bayh bye to the presidency.
David Sirota is a bestselling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network - both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.
This article appeared on page B - 11 of the San Francisco Chronicle
