rearguard
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2044
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:44 pm
You've raised some interesting and important issues. The CRTC's traditional media regulation (print, TV, radio) policies seem more interested in making sure that the media is one sided and corrupt rather than open and honest. Fortunately they've so far left the internet alone (not that they could control it anyway), and it has become perhaps the most open and difficult to manipulate service ever seen in history.<br />
<br />
For example - this request was denied:<br />
<a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060824011301818">CRTC asked to block access to U.S. websites</a> <br />
<br />
There used to be a "false news law", but it was being misused, and ironically thanks to Ernst Zundel, the law was abolished.<br />
<br />
In the end, I think that less regulation is better than more regulation, since regulations tend to be abused, especially when it comes to the information that you are exposed to.<br />
<br />
For example, recently attempts have been made to link 9/11 truth seekers wth Holocaust denial! Imagine if the CRTC could decree that "denial" of official 9/11 dogma is a thought crime?<br />