Perturbed
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2599
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:06 pm
[QUOTE BY= Calumny] Oh, I think they do, Samuel. <br />
<br />
It's just that the agenda being followed may not coincide with what most Canadians might see as their best interests.<br />
<br />
Putting aside for the moment the usual rationale we receive as to why we need 3 or so hundred thousand new immigrants each year, there are a few facts that just haven't gibed with me for quite awhile.<br />
<br />
It's very difficult to see how on one hand we're told we can't afford to maintain parts of our social infrastructure and on the other we continue to place pressure on that infrastructure by allowing a rather significant inflow of immigration each year.<br />
<br />
It's also difficult to understand why when unemployment figures have remained fairly steady for quite a few years, we need the levels of immigration we seen throughout those years, particularly as many of the skills possessed by a number of immigrants aren't productively utilized upon their arrival.<br />
<br />
I agree that there is much more to the immigration story than the line given to Canadians, whether that be in respect of garnering votes, maintaining a large enough pool of available labour to make organization by labour difficult or whatever else.<br />
<br />
I also agree that immigration should, in terms of numbers and origin, be more a provincial and municipal matter, as these are the levels that end up dealing with most of the issues that arise.<br />
<br />
I would have the same concerns if all immigration was of U.K. or other European origin. Similarly, while I think there is much of value in other cultures that can only improve Canadian society, I'm not interested in seeing an influx of any group, whether Brits, French, German Sikh, etc., arriving in Canada and deciding it should reflect what they're accustomed to, or demanding that it do the same. Nor do I see any reason to accede to demands of this nature.<br />
<br />
I certainly wouldn't be moving anywhere myself and expecting that the residents change their beliefs and lifestyles to accomodate my own, so I see nothing wrong in expecting the same courtesy from others.<br />
<br />
[/QUOTE]<br />
<br />
<br />
Hi Calumny. I think winning elections is part of it....and our birthrate is low, not that theey've done anything to improve that, and we used to have 20 million just 40 years ago and things were fine.<br />
<br />
Also, there is no conspiracy theory necessary. Paul Martin has said that "multilculturalism is where the world is going--as we move towards a borderless world."<br />
<br />
Obviously some countries care much more than others about their border, but how can you reason with politiciains who believe in corporations, not countries? They are purposely ruining the solidarity of the populations of all western nations.<br />
<br />
I personally think we should slow immigration down, and it wouldn't bother me if immigrants came mostly from Europe. I'm not saying this is necessarily the only way it can work, but say if most people came from Britain, how could it bother me? It would almost be refreshing to meet people who aren't illiterate in one of our official languages when they get to Canada.
"True nations are united by blood and soil, language, literature, history, faith, tradition and memory". -
-Patrick J. Buchanan