Author Topic Options
Offline

Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1442
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 4:12 pm
 


I have copied the verdict of this international trial which has found G. W. Bush guilty of war crimes against Humanity. 17.Verdict : I find the Defendant , George Walker Bush , President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of United States Armed Forces guilty – 1. Under Article 2 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan and under International Criminal Law ,for waging a war of aggression against Afghanistan and the Afghan people ; 2.Under Article 3, Part I , clause (a) , (b), (c) ,(d), (f),(g) and Article 3, Part II, clause (a),(b),(c)(d),(e),(f), (h)(i),(k),(l),(n),(o),(p),(q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan, under International Criminal Law and International Humanitarian Law , in respect of War Crimes committed against the people of Afghanistan by the use of weapons prohibited by the laws of warfare causing death and destruction to the Afghan people ; maiming men , women and children; 3.Under Article 4 , clause (a) ,(b),(d ),(e),(f) ,(h) and (i ) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal and International Humanitarian Law , for Crimes Against Humanity committed against the people of Afghanistan; resulting in inhumane acts affecting large sections of the population cause by the military invasion , bombing , and lack of humanitarian relief ; 4. Under Article 3, Part I , clause (a),(b),(c),(f),(g) and Article 3 , Part II clause (f),(k),(p), and (q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan , under International Criminal Law and the Hague Convention and Geneva Convention (III ) of 1949 in respect of the torture and killings of Talban and other prisoners of war who had surrendered and their torture and inhumane conditions of detention and deportation of innocent civilians; In respect of the transport of prisoners in sealed Containers and their death due to suffocation and filing of rifle shots at the Container for creating holes for ventilation with the prisoners inside ; and for conditions at Sheberghan prison; the Defendant is entitled to benefit of doubt at this trial however the issues are left open for trial, before any other court /Tribunal ; as the evidence before the Tribunal is not conclusive on the involvement of United States forces ; 5. Under Article 3, Part I (c ) and ( g ); Article 3 Part 2 ( a), (b) ,(c) ,(d ) ( e) (h) ( i) ( l) and Article 4 (b) ,(l) of (n) ,( p),(q) of the ICTA in respect of the serious humanitarian situation resulting from the refugee exodus in Afghanistan due to the bombing of civilian population and civilian infrastructure in a country already affected by serious famine resulting in mass exodus of people and death from bombing , hunger ,displacement, disease ; and absence of humanitarian relief ; 6. Under Article 3 , Part II ,clause(o) (p) and under Article 4 clause (a) ,(b) and (l) of the statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan , and under International Criminal Law and International Humanitarian Law ; in respect of the DU weapons used on the people of Afghanistan to exterminate the population ; and for the crime of "Omnicide " the extermination of life , contamination of air ,water and food resources ; and the irreversible alteration of the genetic code of all living organisms including plant life ; as a direct consequence of the use of radioactive munitions in Afghanistan ; affecting countries in the entire region ; 7. Under Article 3, Part II ,clause(o) (p) and under Article 4(a) and ( i) of the Statute of the International Tribunal for Afghanistan , under International Criminal Law , for exposing soldiers and other personnel of the United States ,UK and other soldiers of coalition forces to radioactive contamination by the use of DU weapons , hazarding their lives, their physiology , and that of their future progeny by irreversible alteration of the genetic code . 18.The Defendant is a convicted war criminal consequently unfit to hold public office ; citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation from the Defendant and his government ; and in declining to obey illegal orders of the Defendant and his administration ;including military orders threatening other nations or the people of the United States on the basis of the Nuremberg Principle, that illegal orders of Superior must not be obeyed.


Offline

Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1442
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:55 pm
 


The evidence given at the trial means that the Liberals have sent our soldiers into a radioactive hell. It means that some or all of our soldiers will be getting sick and dying from a litany of radioactive diseases. Any children conceived after they return from Afghanistan may be ill or deformed. This is not a good thing. Our soldiers should be brought home immediately.


Offline

Forum Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2066
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:01 pm
 


The questions still running through my mind are; by what authority was this tribunal held, what powers do they have, and why are their decisions not common knowledge? If they found these people guilty of war crimes why is nothing being done?

Did you hear Henry Kissinger saying on CNN, that Bush had planned the war in Afganistan for one year? So since they bombed Afganistan in Oct 2001 what year did they start to plan it? There are still more questions than answers.



"aaaah and the whisper of thousands of tiny voices became a mighty deafening roar and they called it 'freedom'!"' Canadians Acting Humanely at home & everywhere


Offline

Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1442
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:50 am
 


Nothing is being done because the US has the most WMD's and has demonstrated that they are more than willing to use them. So long as the international community winks at King George's discretions there is no reason for him to change. All the major countries have a history of back stabbing connivery so don't expect them to start wringing their hands and throwing ashes on their heads. The Tribunal has the authority of international law, unfortunately the self styled international policeman is the culprit. That does not mean that we are free to throw up our hands and say "c'est la guerre". We have to get our government to react accordingly, like you would if you found yourself sitting beside a murderous psychopathic tyrant. I mean we are either going to suck dick or bite off more than we can chew!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



cron
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Vive Le Canada.ca. Powered by © phpBB.