robert_fisher
Active Member
Posts: 249
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:23 am
Well honestly, I was really intrigued by the premise and wondered how they were going to pull of an unbiased movie with the opinions of the Iraqis for the world to hear.
<br />
<br />The problems was is that it wasn't 50/50. It was twenty minutes of people talking about what it was like to live through war, all night bombings, having their children shot at check points, people being forced to leave their homes, very heart renching. Then about 27 minutes in the viewer is forced to watch as Iraqis talk about who was their favorite hollywood star, is it Jack Black or was it Arnold? And how much everyone hated Saddam. I am pretty sure it was world opinion that Saddam was a bad guy before this film was ever made, and it seemed to me that it was more of a justification for the war, than a documentary from the eyes and hearts of Iraqis.
<br />
<br />The only time that anyone was saying, 'yes, I am glad the Americans are here' was when it was a child saying it, or when it was a rich family saying it, or when it was the new President of Iraq saying it.
<br />
<br />I must say though, that the passion of the film was definetly from the people who were saying: 'Yes Saddam is gone and we are happy, but we are not much better off with the Americans.' Which is pretty much world opinion.
<br />
<br />I admit I was dupped. It's unfortunate we can't all be as untrusting as you from the beginning z. I still suggest people watch it though, it was pretty interesting none the less!
<br />
<br />The best part by far was the intent the filmmakers had to try and proove (without fact) that it was Al-Queda, and only Al-Queda who was fighting back against the Americans, organized by Osama Bin Laden.
When an invasion can bring a country its freedom then unconsciousness is true happiness.