AngusThermopyle
Newbie
Posts: 7
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:06 pm
I will try to provide satisfactory answers now to the questions posed.<br />
Point one: use of military resources in time of disaster.<br />
It is true that military weapons are for the most part ill suited for civilian disaster scenario situations. However, the military is the perfect agency for immediate response to said disasters. No other organization in the country has the infrastructure or personel in place to respond as meaningfully or effectively as the military does. Military training is suited as it doesn't just focus on combat skills. A huge amount of training is focused on planning and management. The military has refined it's logistics capabilities to the point where the movement of men and material is accomplished with seeming ease. It isn't easy, far from it, it just appears that way to observers. A large disciplined force can and will acomplish a great deal very efficiently. Each person knows the role they play and execute said role in a professional manner.<br />
Equipement ill suited to the task:<br />
Actually, if you think about it the equipment we use is very well suited to a wide variety of tasks. We spend relatively little on weapons. A great deal of our equipment is deigned to sustain people under the harshest and most varied of conditions. We can move people over extremely difficult terrain. We can provide heat, power, hot meals, and fresh water where their is non. (As in the ice storm)<br />
Disaster training:<br />
The military does a great deal of disaster training.In fact I spent two years on the NERT team in Halifax. NERT stands for Nuclear Emergency Response Team. This doesn't mean that we train for the aftermath of nuclear war. It means we train for any nuclear disaster that might arise. Something like a Reactor emergency, or perhaps a radiological material spill. (We do transport radioactive material across this country)Each base across the country has its team of people who train for disaster response, in time of disaster, they command and co-ordinate personell in response to the particular disaster.<br />
One thing I did directly in a military capacity for Canada:<br />
I already answered that one. when the flood and ice storm happened, I didn't just say "hmmm, think I'll take some leave and go slog through mud and water for a while for fun" I was directed to go, in a military capacity. same for the ice storm, everyone we had within reasonable range, went.<br />
As for your last point about hostility towards corrupt government. Well, I happen to share a similar feeling. Many times I have railed against government policy, however, I took an oath to my country. Further, I was aware that it is better to be a part of an organization and work to affect some small change than it is to just bleat sheaplike, but affect no change whatsoever.<br />
Now, on to my statement about ignorance. In more than a few places on these forums I have seen it said that a video game will provide all the training the military requires. Therin lies the crux of my statement. I dont care who is offended, I just have to say that that is one of the most ignorant things I've heard in a very long time. It shows a total lack of knowledge relating to the subject being discussed. I defy any who consider themselves to be rational to refute this.<br />
Well, I hope that answered your questions.<br />
Oh, by the way, I was never an officer, I was a non comissioned member.