Author | Topic Options |
---|---|
<strong>Written By:</strong> 4Canada
<strong>Date:</strong> 2005-04-11 09:40:00 <a href="/article/120500907-outrage-over-kazemi-missing-in-other-cases">Article Link</a> It would be hard to say otherwise given the description of Kazemi delivered on Thursday by Dr. Shahram Azam, the emergency room physician who saw her when she was admitted, beaten and unconscious, to a Tehran hospital in June, 2003. Prime Minister Paul Martin, no slouch when it comes to outrage, says he finds the whole affair \"simply unacceptable,\" and promised to think about doing something. Conservative foreign affairs critic Stockwell Day is outraged. He wants Canada to suspend diplomatic ties with Iran until the culprits behind Kazemi\'s torture and death are brought to justice. The New Democrats are outraged. The editorial boards of the Toronto Star and The Globe and Mail are outraged. I\'m outraged (journalists take the murder and torture of other journalists personally). It\'s hard not to be outraged since this action, presumably undertaken by Iran\'s security services, was so ... outrageous. Yet, at the same time, it\'s worth noting that there does appear to be an outrage gap operating. I don\'t recall Martin threatening unspecified actions in the wake of the U.S. government\'s decision in 2002 to deport Canadian Maher Arar to be tortured in Syria. I don\'t recall Day calling on Ottawa to suspend diplomatic ties with the U.S. until it delivered up to justice those who bundled Arar onto a private jet, transported him to a CIA prison in Jordan and then handed him over to the Syrians for a year of imprisonment and torture. The Iranians have been stonewalling on the Kazemi case. And as Martin rightly says, that\'s unacceptable. But the U.S. government has been stonewalling equally on the Arar case. It refuses to answer questions posed by Justice Dennis O\'Connor\'s public inquiry. It is trying to derail a civil suit launched by Arar in the U.S. on the grounds of national security. It says it followed its own laws when dealing with Arar and that what it does as a sovereign state is no one else\'s business. Which is pretty much what Iran says when pressed about Kazemi\'s death. Realistically, a country like Canada doesn\'t have much clout with the ayatollahs who run the torture centres of Iran. Nor does it have much clout with those other ayatollahs — like George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld — who run the global system of U.S. torture centres described recently in The New Yorker, The New York Times and The Guardian. So, it\'s hard not to be grudgingly sympathetic to Pettigrew when he whines that cutting off diplomatic relations with Iran over the Kazemi case might be counterproductive. Certainly, it would be counterproductive to the Calgary oil pals of Stockwell Day who want to do business in Iran. Besides, if Canada did cut ties — or if (following the advice of this newspaper) Canada took Iran to the International Criminal Court over its violations of the Geneva Conventions on torture — some bright light might suggest we take similar actions against the U.S. And then where would we be? How could Martin be an effective little pal if he had to defend the interests of all Canadian citizens treated illegally by sovereign states? What if he spoke up not only for Kazemi but for Arar — or even for Omar Khadr, the teenaged Canadian held by the U.S., in contravention of the Geneva Conventions, at Guantánamo Bay. There would be no more invitations to the ranch, that\'s for sure. original; <a href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1112395811419&call_pageid=970599109774&col=Columnist969907626796">http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1112395811419&call_pageid=970599109774&col=Columnist969907626796</a> [Proofreader\'s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 12, 2005] |
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 9 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |